IPS’ Technology and Industrial Management graduate course: an improvement process

2.00

ELSA FERREIRA • RODRIGO LOURENÇO • ROGÉRIO DUARTE • JOANA DUARTE • HELENA GONÇALVES

Informação adicional

Índice

1. IPS’ TECHNOLOGY AND INDUSTRIAL MANAGEMENT GRADUATE COURSE
1.1. CURRICULAR STRUCTURE
1.2. B-LEARNING
2. METODOLOGY
2.1. THE HOUSE OF QUALITY
3. CONCLUSIONS AND FUTURE WORK

Referências

[1]Pires, A.M.R.; Pereira, F.D.; Simões,J.C ( 2012). Benchamarking and QFD-Joint application to the development of engineering courses, 40Th SEFI Conference
[2]Sohn, Young So; Kim, Angela ( 2009). Quality Function Deployment for Engineering Curriculum Redesign, 20Th Australasian Association for Engineering Education Conference, University of Adelaide
[3]Cohen, L. (1995). Quality function deployment. Reading, MA: Addison Wesley Longman
[4]Chan, C.Y.P., Chan, K., lp W.C. (2006) QFD – based Curriculum Planning for Vocational Education, The Eighteenth of Quality Function Deployment, Austin, Texas
[5]Tinto, V (1975),Dropout from Higher Education: A theoretical synthesis of recent research, Review of Educational Research, 45 (1): 89-125
[6]Bean, J. P., Metzner, B. S. (1985). A conceptual model of non-traditional undergraduate student attrition, Review of Educational Research, 55(4): 485-540.
[7]Tharp, J. (1998). Predicting persistence of urban commuter campus students utilizing student background characteristics from enrolment data. Community College Journal of Research and Practice, 22(3): 279-294.
[8]Lourenço, R. T.; Ferreira, E. C.; Duarte, R.;Gonçalves, H. & Duarte, J. ( 2013)IPS’ Technology and Industrial Management graduate course: an improvement process, European Conference on Curriculum Studies